Conversational Maxims Revisited in Holy Trinity College’s Online Platform

Authors

  • Tiffany L. Pua College of Teacher Education, Holy Trinity College, General Santos City, Philippines https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2863-5225
  • Novie Shem C. Baton College of Teacher Education, Holy Trinity College, General Santos City, Philippines
  • Pauleen L. Pandian College of Teacher Education, Holy Trinity College, General Santos City, Philippines
  • Ishak B. Tagadtal College of Teacher Education, Holy Trinity College, General Santos City, Philippines
  • Princess D’yan Natasha B. Tool College of Teacher Education, Holy Trinity College, General Santos City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0448

Keywords:

Conversational Maxims, Pragmatic Competence, Online Discourse, Facebook Interactions, Student Communication

Abstract

This study examined how Grice’s conversational maxims of Quantity, Quality, Relation, and Manner were manifested in student-generated comments on Holy Trinity College’s official Facebook platform during Academic Year 2025–2026. An initial set of 150 comments was screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, after which 50 comments were retained as the final analytical dataset. Each retained comment was examined against all four maxims, yielding 200 comment–maxim analytical instances. Twelve comments were selected as representative cases for detailed qualitative presentation. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design informed by pragmatic analysis. In the final dataset, Quantity was observed in 38 instances and violated in 12; Quality was observed in 27, flouted in 21, and violated in 2; Relation was observed in 20 and violated in 30; and Manner was observed in 6 and violated in 44. No flouting was identified for Quantity, Relation, or Manner. The findings indicate comparatively stronger adherence to informativeness and apparent truthfulness, while relevance and clarity presented greater challenges. Quality flouting was associated with irony, sarcasm, figurative language, and wordplay. A communication guide was developed to translate these findings into practical guidance for clearer, relevant, truthful, and contextually appropriate online communication. The study contributes localized evidence on pragmatic meaning-making in a Philippine higher-education Facebook environment.

References

Aporbo, R. J. (2022). Exploring Gricean maxims in Facebook conversations through the lens of Gen-Z users: A pragmatic analysis. International Journal of Research Publications, 111(1), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP10011111020224054

Atifi, H., Mandelcwajg, S., & Marcoccia, M. (2011). The co-operative principle and computer-mediated communication: The maxim of quantity in newsgroup discussions. Language Sciences, 33(2), 330– 340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.011

Ayunon, C. (2018). Gricean maxims revisited in FB conversation posts: Its pedagogical implications. TESOL International Journal, 13(4), 82–95.

Dynel, M. (2017). But seriously: On conversational humour and (un)truthfulness. Lingua, 197, 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.05.004

Erdoğdu, F., & Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2021). The educational power of humor on student engagement in online learning environments. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41039-021-00158-8

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

Hanifah, I. R. (2013). Non-observance of maxims in Facebook conversation: A case study in English Education Department. Passage, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/psg.v1i2.546

Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016

Herring, S. C., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T. (Eds.). (2013). Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468

Rahardi, R. K. (2022). Memerikan fungsi konteks situasi dalam perspektif pragmatik siber. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.286

Stotts, M. H. (2024). Conversational maxims as social norms. Inquiry, 67(9), 3087–3109. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.2020158

Yus, F. (2021). Pragmatics, humour and the internet. Internet Pragmatics, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00067.yus

Zentz, L. (2020). Conversational maxims and conversational implicature. In The international encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0081

Downloads

Published

2026-10-08

How to Cite

Pua, T., Baton, N. S., Pandian, P., Tagadtal, I., & Tool, P. D. N. (2026). Conversational Maxims Revisited in Holy Trinity College’s Online Platform . International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(9), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0448

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.