Smart Property, Plant, and Equipment Management Using a Random Forest Classification Algorithm

Authors

  • Augustine Chinedu B. Nworji School of Graduate Studies, AMA University, Quezon City, Philippines https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4704-3524
  • Carmencita Gadi Rabano School of Graduate Studies, AMA University, Quezon City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0436

Keywords:

Asset Lifecycle Management, Decision Support, Depreciation, Predictive Analytics, Random Forest

Abstract

Property, plant, and equipment management requires accurate records, reliable depreciation calculations, condition monitoring, and timely lifecycle decisions. This study developed a web-based property, plant, and equipment management system using a Random Forest classification algorithm. The system uses a MySQL database and PHP- and Python-based processing to support asset registration, record retrieval, calculation, classification, and decision-support reporting. It calculates straight-line, double-declining-balance, and sum-of-the-years’-digits depreciation and generates classification-based lifecycle guidance. A dataset of 612 asset records from 2009 to 2025 was used for model development. Inputs included asset category, asset type, purchase date, useful life, maintenance frequency, maintenance cost, and recurring issues. A stratified 80:20 training-test split evaluated two classifiers: asset status (Active, For Maintenance, For Replacement, or For Disposal) and asset outcome (Best, Average, or Worst). Functional testing compared depreciation outputs with expected values, while 11 intended users completed a structured 7-point Likert-scale survey. On the held-out test set, the asset-status model achieved 95.12% accuracy, 95.65% weighted precision, 95.12% weighted recall, 95.16% weighted F1-score, and 99.47% multiclass ROC-AUC. The asset-outcome model achieved 96.75% accuracy, 96.94% weighted precision, 96.75% weighted recall, 96.67% weighted F1-score, and 99.76% multiclass ROC-AUC. The depreciation outputs matched expected values, and user-acceptance construct means ranged from 6.30 to 6.80 out of 7. The findings demonstrate the feasibility and initial effectiveness, within the evaluated setting, of integrating asset records, depreciation, predictive classification, and reporting to support asset lifecycle decisions. The outputs are decision-support information and do not replace professional judgment or organizational approval. This supports more consistent review of asset condition and value.

References

Biau, G., & Scornet, E. (2016). A random forest guided tour. TEST, 25(2), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. da P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. S. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, Article 106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Franklin, M., Graybeal, P., & Cooper, D. (2019). Principles of accounting, volume 1: Financial accounting. OpenStax. https://openstax.org/books/principles-financial-accounting/pages/11-3-explain-and-apply-depreciation-methods-to-allocate-capitalized-costs

Gupta, V., Mitra, R., Koenig, F., Kumar, M., & Tiwari, M. K. (2023). Predictive maintenance of baggage handling conveyors using IoT. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 177, Article 109033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109033

Gutschi, C., Furian, N., Suschnigg, J., Neubacher, D., & Voessner, S. (2019). Log-based predictive maintenance in discrete parts manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 79, 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.098

Hosamo, H. H., Svennevig, P. R., Svidt, K., Han, D., & Nielsen, H. K. (2022). A digital twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics. Energy and Buildings, 261, Article 111988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111988

Internal Revenue Service. (2025). Publication 946: How to depreciate property. https://www.irs.gov/publications/p946

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury. (2022). 26 C.F.R. § 1.167(b)-3: Sum of the years-digits method. U.S. Government Publishing Office. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2022-title26-vol3/pdf/CFR-2022-title26-vol3-sec1-167b-3.pdf

Kiangala, K. S., & Wang, Z. (2018). Initiating predictive maintenance for a conveyor motor in a bottling plant using Industry 4.0 concepts. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 97, 3251–3271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2093-8

Kiangala, K. S., & Wang, Z. (2020). An effective predictive maintenance framework for conveyor motors using dual time-series imaging and convolutional neural network in an Industry 4.0 environment. IEEE Access, 8, 121033–121049. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3006788

Liu, X., He, D., Lodewijks, G., Pang, Y., & Mei, J. (2019). Integrated decision making for predictive maintenance of belt conveyor systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 188, 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.047

Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2, Article 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x

Ucar, A., Karakose, M., & Kırımça, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance applications: Key components, trustworthiness, and future trends. Applied Sciences, 14(2), Article 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020898

Wu, M., Goh, K. W., Chaw, K. H., Koh, Y. S., Dares, M., Yeong, C. F., Su, E. L. M., Holderbaum, W., & Zhang, Y. (2024). An intelligent predictive maintenance system based on random forest for addressing industrial conveyor belt challenges. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 10, Article 1383202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2024.1383202

Žarković, M., & Stojković, Z. (2019). Artificial intelligence SF6 circuit breaker health assessment. Electric Power Systems Research, 175, Article 105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2019.105912

Downloads

Published

2026-10-09

How to Cite

Nworji, A. C., & Rabano, C. (2026). Smart Property, Plant, and Equipment Management Using a Random Forest Classification Algorithm. International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(9), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0436

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.